Category Archives: u stranieru

Bad english posts

Eolie mon amour: earth, water, air and fire

Returning from a week in Eolie Islands, I talk about my beautiful experience.

Lipari is the biggest of the Eolies, the most commercial and touristic one and, therefore, also the most economic: in fact it is here that I and my girlfriend have lodged. The principal towns of the island are Lipari, Pianoconte, Quattropani, Acquacalda, Canneto.

Lipari's highland with the castle and the church Sunset in Pianoconte Church in Quattropani Landscape of Acquacalda Landscape of Centoscalini beach, near Canneto

Among the most beautiful beaches, I quote Centoscalini or “White beach” (in the photo above), the beach of pumice stone and another that is attainable in two ways: paying the boat service from the Lipari port or walking along a very steep path that departs from the hill. Obviously, we have chosen “the difficult street” ;-).

The Pumice Stone Caves Landscape of the path in the hill Landscape of the path in the hill Along the hill After the walk, the sea

To turn the island in moped (or in bicycle) in the late afternoon is relaxing and it makes you always discover new promontories, new roads, new houses and new feelings.

The best panoramic point in Lipari Before the sunset Arson in Lipari

We have been on other two islands: Stromboli and Panarea. Together with Lipari, it is the third time that I visit them; next time, however, I will go in the other four: Vulcano, Salina, Alicudi and Filicudi.

Panarea is very small, is all built in steep slope and it is painted with four colors: the green of the mediterranean plants, the blue of the sky, the bright blue of the sea and the white of the houses and the yachts. The landscape is more savage than in Lipari, the beaches are beautiful, particularly the famous Cala Zimmari.

Landscape with boats in Panarea Landscape with yachts Panorama of Cala Zimmari Path in the hill The gull and the cat

Stromboli is not an island: Stromboli is the Mediterranean sea, is the Sicily, is the power of the Earth, is the timid presence of man, is the Fire and is Aeolus in person. It is the most beautiful, the wildest of the Eolie Islands. Stromboli doesn’t have confinements, the sea is an its prolongation. The only rampart, the Strombolicchio rock. The volcano is in continuous activity, it spits ash and red hot stones that, punctually, roll along the Sciara del Fuoco.

Puff of ash The Strombolicchio The Strombolicchio White Bouganville The Strombolicchio The Strombolicchio in the hand

But Stromboli is also Ginostra a group of houses placed in the opposite part of the island. You can arrive to Ginostra only by boat, a small boat, because his port is one of the smallest in the world; its few inhabitants are taciturn, they love silence and they hate the electric energy, that they have never had for many years.

Little boat for Ginostra Ginostra's port

There are no words to describe the atmosphere that you can breathes in Eolie Islands, you have to go here to touch with your hand the four natural elements.

Posted in u stranieru | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Robert Plant and the Strange Sensation, live at Taormina

If, when I was fifteen, someone had told me “one day you will go to a concert of Led Zeppelin“, I would have laughed a lot certainly!

No, I haven’t gone to that concert and surely I will never go there (even if there are rumors about a reunion with the Bonham’s child), but what I have seen sunday evening at the ancient greek theater of Taormina is enough!

After two hours, in which three groups are alternated (particularly the magic Tinariwen), Robert Plant arrives with the amazing Strange Sensation.

Already with the first beautiful song I shiver: the voice seems really that of Robert Plant, the same that I listening for years. It is a little lower, deeper, but it doesn’t show some sixty years (or it perhaps shows them all, it depends on the points of view). The second song gives me the certainty.

Then, the madness: Robert screams “Hey hey mama, said the way you move gon’ make you sweat, gon’ make you groove“. It was the great Black Dog.

After amazing songs like Freedom Fries and Tin Pan Valley, that you can listen in the album Mighty Rearrenger, come the unmistakable sounds of Babe I’m Gonna Leave You and Going To California.

All the Led Zeppelin’s songs have almost been remixed together with oriental rhythms and with a cleaner rock, less ‘n roll, but of big effect.

But the best still had to come. Would you guess with which song Robert and the Strange Sensation had closed the concert? Perhaps it is banal, but the felt emotion is indescribable. The theater seems to collapse.

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=88EE225D63E02D76
Posted in u stranieru | Tagged , , | 1 Comments

The metaphoric truth

I believe that the metaphor is the “prince” of human resources. It’s not only a matter of language, but of essence: all the human expressions are metaphoric.

About metaphor, there is a brief text written by Friedrich Nietzsche which I would like to talk about: On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense. Already in the incipit, we immediately enter in nietzschean atmospheare:

Once upon a time, in some out of the way corner of that universe which is dispersed into numberless twinkling solar systems, there was a star upon which clever beasts invented knowing. That was the most arrogant and mendacious minute of “world history,” but nevertheless, it was only a minute. After nature had drawn a few breaths, the star cooled and congealed, and the clever beasts had to die.

Friedrich Nietzsche

The man feels his intellect as the center of the world but, Nietzsche says, “if we could communicate with the gnat, we would learn that he likewise flies through the air with the same solemnity, that he feels the flying center of the universe within himself”. From this example of the deep relativity of human knowledge, the author analyzes the genesis of this last and discloses its deep lack of truth:

What then is truth? A movable host of metaphors, metonymies, and; anthropomorphisms: in short, a sum of human relations which have been poetically and rhetorically intensified, transferred, and embellished, and which, after long usage, seem to a people to be fixed, canonical, and binding.

There’s not any truth in human language, because the truth isn’t only a series of sounds that we call words, but it’s above all a matter of meaning. Before being sound, a word is a nervous stimulus and a mental representation. We understand, therefore, that the language’s aboutness (which meaning the ability that the words have to refer to world’s things) is very least. I think that our “truth” could be compared to what, for Plato, sensitive reality was in comparison to the realm of ideas: an imitation. But the Nietzsche’s platonism (yes, I know it sounds “strange”) is more radical, in the sense that it goes to the terrestrial roots, so he proposes the language as a metaphoric imitation of this reality.

But if this is the characteristic proper of language (of all the languages) and, therefore, of truth that is express through the language, what’s the difference among a “scientific” discourse and “poetry”? There’s a difference, but it’s oddly contrary to what we usually think: the poetry is more scientific than science.

If truth is “a movable host of metaphors”, the real scientist is he who knows how to use the metaphor. He who has the full power of it, he who metaphorically represents the reality that surrounds him. In this ability, the philosophers (I think to Nietzsche and Heidegger) are masters: they know how to express the content (the world) in a form that knows how to represent it. For this reason, Nietzsche and Heidegger are the more criticized philosophers for how they use the language. Often I hear the people say that what Heidegger expresses in difficult metaphors, formulas and turns of phrases, is “so banal” that could be said in a more simply way.

But reflect: if Nietzsche is right, and I believe that he is, to remove the metaphor from heideggerian texts (and from nietzschean texts) means to falsify that texts and that reality (our reality) that they represent.

Then, the philosophy and the poetry are the most rigorous forms of science. If we bring this reasoning to the extreme consequences, we have to conclud that poetry and philosophy should not so clearly be separated (the poetry as “art”, the philosophy as rational thought), but that they should give life (together with science) to a more conscious language, to a humbler thought, to a more human man.

Posted in u stranieru | Tagged | 1 Comment

Blessed are the rich in spirit

I have thought about the first beatitude, it’s an indecency. Here it is:

Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

Matthew 5:3, 12

I don’t know what is taught in catechism today, but for me the “poor in spirit” are a well precise kind of people: the ignorant persons. The first beatitude is a praise of ignorance.

Does the catechism interpret the “poor of spirit” like “humble”? It’s worse! Here, humility means an only thing: total enslavement to God; prohibition to set questions; “to behead yourself” and to put every hope and responsibility in the Almighty. In short: to voluntarily stop thinking.

This is a perspective so distant from those of Saints-philosophers (Agostino, Thomas Aquinas etc.) who, with theirs continuous to ask and confess themselves, tested and tried the own themselves faith, who putted in crisis the own themselves religion and imposed her a renewal, who challenged the themselves own God with the Reason.

This monotheism is strong for this reason: it favors the insane need of sloth in human beings.

Posted in u stranieru | 2 Comments

False altruism and non-functional magnetic resonance

Some day ago, I read this news on internet: Paying taxes lights up the brain.

The tool used for this “amazing” discovery is the functional magnetic resonance, a device that is too much overestimated. Practically, every link among a neural configuration and the human behavior is a novelty! But it isn”t a novelty, rather it is like “discover the warm water”.

Functional magnetic resonance: the truth machine?

The research of the University of Oregon was directed by a cognitive psychologist and two economists (what terrible triumvirate!). They found that two ancient regions of our brain fixed when we spent our money voluntarily (like in charity and in mandatory taxations). This regions are the same that fixed when basic needs such as food and pleasures (sweets or social contact) are satisfied.

But this research is so banal and obvious! Is incredible that the american University spent their money in this way! And that isn”t all, folks. In fact, if the research team had draw the correct conclusions, I didn”t criticize anything.

The psycologist Ulrich Mayr says:

The surprising element for us was that in a situation in which your money is simply given to others – where you do not have a free choice – you still get reward-center activity. I don”t think that most economists would have suspected that. It reinforces the idea that there is true altruism.

Altruismo

What is there of amazing in discovering that “charity” satisfies a basic need? It satisfies our need to appease the sense of guilt provoked by to think about the least fortunate lives than our life. And it isn”t an altruistic demand, but entirely egoistic. Like eating and drinking. In fact, said Prof. Alberto Giovanni Biuso (I do the translation from the italian text):

The one who take a decision, that has a certain style of life, that take choices, do it always and inevitably because decisions, style and choices gratify him. [...] There”s nothing negative or perverse in all this! It is inevitable and correct that it is like that. In the world there is no worth and there is no guilt. [...] Let”s free us from the morals, from the senses of guilt, from the remorses, from the punishment.

The power of our body-mind is the necessary motor of our actions. The charity, the altruism and the love are beautiful consequences, not causes.

Posted in u stranieru | 1 Comment